Case Study: Recovering 43M kg of Condensate and Improving Heater Stability at Helwan Fertilizer Company (HFC)

Case Study: Recovering 43M kg of Condensate and Improving Heater Stability at Helwan Fertilizer Company (HFC)

Case Study: Recovering 43M kg of Condensate and Improving Heater Stability at Helwan Fertilizer Company (HFC)

Helwan Fertilizer Company (HFC) is a leading fertilizer manufacturer in Egypt. At their plant in Helwan, uptime, thermal stability, and safe operations directly influence throughput and cost.
HFC’s new condensate recovery system helped them recover 90% of the condensate previously dumped to drain and stabilize multiple production-critical heat exchangers.

Results at a glance

  • Condensate recovered: 43M kg (90% of previously dumped condensate)
  • Annual water savings, including chemicals: ~USD 42,000
  • Annual steam production cost savings: ~USD 108,000
  • Total annual savings: ~USD 150,000

The Challenge

A critical heating system was unstable and inefficient as condensate flow was restricted due to low internal pressure, and the stalled condensate had to be dumped to drain.

Flow restriction

In HFC’s granulation process, the air pre-heater/heater system experienced instability linked to condensate handling. To keep production stable, operators resorted to draining condensate to the drain instead of recovering it.

  • Energy waste: Condensate (and its recoverable heat) was lost instead of being returned to the condensate tank.
  • Manual intervention: Operators repeatedly opened/closed valves to maintain required heating.
  • Operational risk: Temperature drops at the heat exchanger could threaten process stability.

Scale and business impact

Three air pre-heaters in the granulation unit of the plant were affected by this issue. This had been a constant pain point for years, not just at HFC but across industries in Egypt.

Because the system was described as critical for the production process, a heating failure could trigger production losses of millions of dollars per day.

The Approach

Decision criteria: stabilize heating without adding downtime risk

HFC needed a solution that could:

  1. Eliminate condensate dumping and recover condensate back to the condensate system
  2. Reduce frequent manual intervention by operators
  3. Protect production stability in a sensitive, high-consequence area
  4. Be installed and commissioned while the plant was running (to avoid costly downtime)
  5. Reduce heat and water wastage and lower production cost

Overcoming adoption barriers

A key blocker was operational confidence. Operators and engineers were concerned that changes to a sensitive heater system could create new issues or disrupt production.

Diverse Supplies addressed this with an engineering-first approach:

  • Engineering calculations
  • Written engineering-based reports
  • Gradual stakeholder buy-in—especially from the energy team

The Solution

Condensate recovery using a steam-motive mechanical pump skid

Diverse Supplies implemented an Armstrong condensate recovery approach using a mechanical pump skid:

  • A receiver collects condensate from all heaters
  • Two steam-motive pumps recover the condensate back to the condensate tank
  • Recovered hot condensate is reused rather than being dumped to drain
  • Scalable system design allows more heaters to be connected in future
Condensate to ground

Before

A visible line/valve draining
condensate to drain

After

Discharge stopped; condensate
routed to receiver and recovered

Implementation

Project phases

The project included:

  1. Early site observations
  2. Evaluation of solution approaches
  3. System redesign
  4. Procurement
  5. Installation
  6. Commissioning
  7. Performance monitoring and support

Commissioning in live operating environment: complexity and safety

A major complexity was that the upgrade had to be installed and commissioned while the plant was running, requiring careful planning, increased coordination, safety requirements, and risk management.

Results

  1. Full condensate recovery, wastage eliminated. 90% of condensate (~43M kg/year) was saved from being dumped to drain.
  2. Improved stability with steam operating pressure reduced from 9 bar to 4 bar due by elimination of stall condition in winter
  3. Significant annual savings from returning hot condensate
    ~USD 108,000/year steam production savings from high pressure steam in turbine
    ~USD 42,000/year water savings due to recovered condensate.
  4. Reduced operator intervention
  5. Payback period of just 3 months.

Why it worked

  • Engineered for a sensitive process: Designed around stability first, not just energy recovery.
  • Long term, scalable solution design: High reliability mechanical solution
  • Reduced reliance on manual balancing and mitigated condensate handling issues.
  • Stakeholder buy-in and adoption: Project team gained stakeholder trust though meticulous calculations and reporting
  • Executed live without shutdown: Careful step-by-step implementation protected production continuity.

Diverse Supplies Project Lead:
Amr Badawi, Technical Sales Team Lead

HFC Project Owner:
Khaled Mubarak, Energy Management Department Director

Have a similar issue at your plant?

Request a condensate recovery assessment to identify where dumping, venting, or unstable condensate handling is costing energy, water, and uptime.

Blog categories

Recent comments